THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANDREW E. HUNTOON, RANDY E. MEIROWITZ,
SRIRAM P. ANJUR, ROBERT J. PHELAN,
KIM T. TANG and ANTHONY J. WISNESKI
____________
Appeal No. 97-4294
Application No. 08/294,1551
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 39, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed August 22, 1994. According
to the appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part
of Application No. 08/157,802, filed November 23, 1993, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007