THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN T. LAVIN
____________
Appeal No. 97-4429
Application No. 08/404,6661
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 12 through 21, which are all of the claims
pending in this application. On page 2 of the brief, the
appellant states that the rejection of claims 14 and 18 is not
being appealed. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed with
respect to claims 14 and 18. Claims 12, 13, 15 through 17 and 19
through 21 remain on appeal.
1Application for patent filed March 15, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007