Appeal No. 98-0102 Application 08/030,734 The references applied by the examiner in the final rejection are: Gould 2,191,198 Feb. 20, 1940 Morrison 2,356,778 Aug. 29, 1944 Derosier 4,399,664 Aug. 23, 1983 O’Reilly 4,407,142 Oct. 04, 1983 The claims on appeal stand finally rejected as follows: 1. Claims 1 to 3, 5 to 7, 10, 24 to 29, 32 and 33, as being unpatentable over Morrison, under 35 USC § 103; 2. Claims 4, 12 and 15 as being unpatentable over Morrison in view of Derosier or O’Reilly, under 35 USC § 103; 3. Claims 30 and 31, as being unpatentable over Morrison in view of Gould, under 35 USC § 103. We note initially that appellant asserts on page 49 of his brief that the final rejection was premature, and on page 52, that the amendment after final rejection (footnote 2, supra) should not have been denied entry. However, these are matters which are not within our jurisdiction to consider, and should have been raised by petition to the Commissioner under 37 CFR 1.181, rather than on appeal to this Board. See Ex 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007