THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 9
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN R. VIG
and RAYMOND L. FILLER
_____________
Appeal No. 98-0174
Application 08/545,1621
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, TORCZON and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 16 , all of the claims in the application.2
1 Application for patent filed October 19, 1995.
2 While the appendix to the brief shows claims 1 through 13 and 15
through 17, claim 15 was renumbered as claim 14 in accordance with 37 CFR 1.126,
which resulted in claim 16 becoming new claim 15 and claim 17 becoming new claim
16.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007