THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 26 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JACK R. LINDLEY, JR. __________ Appeal No. 98-0363 Application 08/740,3891 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Jack R. Lindley, Jr. (the appellant) appeals from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-7 and 9-23, the only claims remaining in the application. 1Application for patent filed October 29, 1996. According to appellant, the application is a continuation of Application 08/440,096, filed May 12, 1995, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 08/407,334, filed March 20, 1995, now abandoned. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007