THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HEINZ RASEL
____________
Appeal No. 98-0384
Application No. 08/579,6391
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Heinz Rasel (the appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claims 2, 8, 13, 17, 18 and 20. Claims 3-6, 9-12
and 15 have been indicated as being allowable subject to the
1Application for patent filed December 27, 1995.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 08/252,862 filed June 2, 1994, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007