THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DAVID G. WILSON
_______________
Appeal No. 98-0541
Application No. 08/409,1371
_______________
HEARD: April 7, 1998
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, CALVERT,
Administrative Patent Judge, and McKELVEY, Senior
Administrative
Patent Judge.
PER CURIAM
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. 134
Application filed March 23, 1995, seeking to reissue U.S. Patent 5,259,444,1
granted November 9, 1993, based on application 07/609,362, filed November 5, 1990. We
are told that the real party in interest is the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007