THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TIMOTHY A. NIEMIER
_____________
Appeal No. 98-0964
Application 08/557,4361
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
FRANKFORT and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 23 through 34, which are all of the claims
Application for patent filed November 14, 1995. According to1
appellant, this application is a continuation-in-part of application no.
29/020,506, filed March 25, 1994, which was a continuation-in-part of
application no. 29/011,308, filed August 2, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007