Appeal No. 98-2069 Application No. 29/052,369 with a reasonable degree of certainty, a rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, is appropriate. In order to make a rejection, the examiner has the initial burden to establish a reasonable basis to question whether the claim sets out and circumscribes a particular area with a reasonable degree of precision and particularity. That is, the examiner must provide a reasonable explanation as to why the scope of protection provided by the claim is not adequately set forth with a reasonable degree of certainty. Assuming that sufficient reason for such doubt exists, a rejection for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the applicant regards as the invention will be proper on that basis. Once the examiner has established a reasonable basis to question the clarity of the claimed invention, the burden falls on the applicant to present persuasive arguments, supported by suitable proofs where necessary, that the designer of ordinary skill in the art would be able to 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007