CABILLY et al. V. BOSS et al. - Page 46




                   Interference No. 102,572                                                                                                                          

                             Lastly, Cabilly et al. argue in their reply brief (page 16) that Cabilly testified that he                                              
                   ligated fragments I, II and III and transformed them into E.coli and that he later                                                                
                   retransformed these cells to get cotransformed cells potentially expressing both the heavy                                                        
                   and light chains; that Rey corroborates this testimony because he analyzed these                                                                  
                   transformants by restriction analysis and sequencing before Boss et al.’ March 25, 1983                                                           
                   filing date.  Cabilly et al. in their brief set forth their scenario for priority and included the                                                
                   work of Cabilly et al. in ligating fragments I, II and III to prepare  pGammaCEAFABtrp207-                                                        
                   1* (identified by Cabilly et al. as a plasmid vector for the direct expression of the FAB                                                         
                   fragment of the heavy chain gene) (see ¶ 15, Cabilly et al. case). However, they did not rely                                                     
                   upon Cabilly’s testimony that he later retransfomed these cells potentially expressing both                                                       
                   heavy and light chains.   Moreover, there are no argument’s in the Cabilly et al. brief                                                           
                   directed to the work of Cabilly et al. in the preparation of pGammaCEAFABtrp207-1*                                                                

                   transforming these into E.coli  nor to the cotransformation of this heavy chain with a light                                                      

                   chain.  Hence, both of these new arguments are not  entitled to any consideration.32                                                              


                             32Even assuming arguendo that Cabilly et al. relied upon this testimony and made                                                        
                   such an argument in their brief, such testimony would not be deemed sufficient to establish                                                       
                   an actual reduction to practice as now alleged because an inventor’s testimony and                                                                
                   documentation are self-serving and have no corroborative value.  Moreover, while Rey                                                              
                   testified that he analyzed the transformant pGammaCEAFABtrp207-1*, there is no                                                                    
                   corroborating evidence of record with respect to Cabilly’s alleged work on any                                                                    
                   cotransformation involving pGammaCEAFABtrp207-1*.  There is no evidence proferred to                                                              
                   establish (1)  what Rey found upon sequencing the heavy chain transformant, (2)  whether                                                          
                   Rey sequenced a light chain transformant; (3) whether Rey analyzed a cotransformant                                                               
                   containing plasmid(s) containing the heavy and light chains of CEA.66-E3 antibody; and                                                            
                                                                                                                               (continued...)                        
                                                                                46                                                                                   





Page:  Previous  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007