Interference No. 102,572 Lastly, Cabilly et al. argue in their reply brief (page 16) that Cabilly testified that he ligated fragments I, II and III and transformed them into E.coli and that he later retransformed these cells to get cotransformed cells potentially expressing both the heavy and light chains; that Rey corroborates this testimony because he analyzed these transformants by restriction analysis and sequencing before Boss et al.’ March 25, 1983 filing date. Cabilly et al. in their brief set forth their scenario for priority and included the work of Cabilly et al. in ligating fragments I, II and III to prepare pGammaCEAFABtrp207- 1* (identified by Cabilly et al. as a plasmid vector for the direct expression of the FAB fragment of the heavy chain gene) (see ¶ 15, Cabilly et al. case). However, they did not rely upon Cabilly’s testimony that he later retransfomed these cells potentially expressing both heavy and light chains. Moreover, there are no argument’s in the Cabilly et al. brief directed to the work of Cabilly et al. in the preparation of pGammaCEAFABtrp207-1* transforming these into E.coli nor to the cotransformation of this heavy chain with a light chain. Hence, both of these new arguments are not entitled to any consideration.32 32Even assuming arguendo that Cabilly et al. relied upon this testimony and made such an argument in their brief, such testimony would not be deemed sufficient to establish an actual reduction to practice as now alleged because an inventor’s testimony and documentation are self-serving and have no corroborative value. Moreover, while Rey testified that he analyzed the transformant pGammaCEAFABtrp207-1*, there is no corroborating evidence of record with respect to Cabilly’s alleged work on any cotransformation involving pGammaCEAFABtrp207-1*. There is no evidence proferred to establish (1) what Rey found upon sequencing the heavy chain transformant, (2) whether Rey sequenced a light chain transformant; (3) whether Rey analyzed a cotransformant containing plasmid(s) containing the heavy and light chains of CEA.66-E3 antibody; and (continued...) 46Page: Previous 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007