Interference No. 103,258
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
In accordance with the "Concession of Priority by
Leopold as to Count 2", which is the sole count in the
interference, judgment as to the subject matter of the count
is hereby entered against Leopold's claims that correspond to
the count (i.e., patent claims 1-11), which means Leopold is
not entitled to a patent containing those claims. Judgment is
therefore awarded in favor of Enger's claims that correspond
to the count (i.e., application claims 35 and 40-42), which
means Enger is entitled to a patent containing those claims.
We note that Leopold has also filed a paper
disclaiming the remaining term of all of the claims of his
involved patent.
It should not be assumed the examiner has reviewed
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007