Interference No. 103,795 METZ, PATE, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges. MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge. In accordance with junior party Pfiester et al.'s concession of priority as to Substitute Count 1, judgment is hereby entered against Pfiester et al.'s claims that correspond to that count, i.e., patent claims 1 and 8, which means Pfiester et al. are not entitled to a patent including those claims. Judgment therefore is awarded in favor of Ikeda et al.'s claims that correspond to the count, i.e., application claims 1-5, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18-20, 24, 25, 39-42, and 45-49, which means Ikeda et al. are entitled to a patent including those claims. ) __________________________ ) ANDREW H. METZ ) Administrative Patent Judge) ) ) BOARD OF __________________________ ) PATENT APPEALS WILLIAM F. PATE, III ) AND Administrative Patent Judge) INTERFERENCES ) ) __________________________ ) - 2 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007