Interference No. 103,923
METZ, PATE, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Junior party Sakayori did not respond to the paper
mailed January 13, 1998, which ordered him pursuant to 37 CFR
§ 1.640(d)(2) to show cause within twenty days why judgment
should not be entered against his claims that correspond to
the count for failing to file a preliminary statement or any
preliminary motions. Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered
against Sakayori's claims that correspond to the count, i.e.,
patent claims 1 and 2, which means Sakayori is not entitled to
a patent including those claims. Judgment is awarded in favor
of Inoue et al.'s claims that correspond to the count, i.e.,
application claims 19-22, which means they are entitled to a
patent including those claims.
)
__________________________ )
ANDREW H. METZ )
Administrative Patent Judge)
)
) BOARD
OF
__________________________ ) PATENT
APPEALS
WILLIAM F. PATE, III ) AND
Administrative Patent Judge) INTERFERENCES
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007