Interference No. 104,055 Now comes the junior party Eddison et al. with a disclaimer of patent claims 1-4, 6-13, and 15-23. These are all the claims designated as corresponding to the count. Under 37 CFR § 1.662(c), a disclaimer of all patent claims designated as corresponding to the count is to be treated as a request for entry of adverse judgment. Accordingly, the following judgment is entered. Judgment Judgment is hereby entered against Alan Eddison, Charles Ingold, and Lawrence J. Leising, the junior party. Alan Eddison, Charles Ingold, and Lawrence J. Leising are not entitled to their patent containing claims 1-4, 6-13, and 15- 23, which claims correspond to the count in interference. Judgment is entered in favor of Michael L. Smith and Charles E. Goodman, the senior party. Michael L. Smith and Charles E. Goodman are entitled to a patent containing claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 17, and 19-48, which claims correspond to the count in interference. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007