BEELEY et al. V. FENTON et al. V. HILLS et al. - Page 3

          Interference No. 104,072                                                    



               Accordingly, JUDGEMENT as to the subject matter of the                 
          count in issue is hereby awarded to the senior party, GARRY                 
          FENTON, ANDREW MORLEY, MALCOLM PALFREYMAN, ANDREW RATCLIFFE,                
          BRIAN SHARP, SUKANTHINI THURAIRATNAM, KEITH STUTTLE, BERNARD                
          VACHER, MICHAEL ASHTON, DAVID COOK, SUSAN HILLS, IAN MCFARLANE              
          and NIGEL VICKER.                                                           


          NIGEL BEELEY and THOMAS MILLICAN are not entitled to their                  
          U.S. patent 5,340,827 containing claims 1 through 16.                       
               On this record, Fenton et al. are entitled to claims 47                
          through 79 and 88 through 90 corresponding to the count.                    





                                                       )                              
                         MICHAEL SOFOCLEOUS            )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         MARY F. DOWNEY                     )                         
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )   APPEALS AND                
                                                       )                              
                                                       )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                       )                              
                         JOAN ELLIS                    )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007