Interference No. 104,151
CORRECTED JUDGMENT UNDER 37 CFR § 1.662
_____________
METZ, PATE, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
The judgment mailed October 28, 1998, is incorrect
and therefore vacated.
In accordance with Tada et al.'s and Jang et al.'s
written requests for entry of adverse judgment, judgment is
hereby entered pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662 against Tada et
al.'s application claims that correspond to the count, i.e.,
claims 1-12, 19, 20, 23, and 24, which means Tada et al. are
not entitled to a patent including those claims, and also
against Jang et al.'s application claims that correspond to
the count, i.e., claims 1, 2, 4, and 7-11, which means Jang et
al. are not entitled to a patent including those claims.
Judgment is accordingly awarded in favor of Sung et al.'s
application claims that correspond to the count, i.e., claims
1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 13,
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007