Interference No. 104,188
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
Now comes senior party Heidel et al. with a concession of
priority with respect to the subject matter of the count in
interference. Under 37 CFR § 1.662(a) such a concession is to
be treated as a request for entry of adverse judgment.
Accordingly, the following judgment is entered.
Judgment
Judgment in Interference No. 104,188 is hereby entered
against the senior party, Raymond Heidel and Richard E.
Snyder. Raymond Heidel and Richard E. Snyder are not entitled
to a patent containing claims 1 through 5 and 8, which claims
correspond to the count in interference. Judgment is entered
in favor of Peter D. Dickinson, the junior party. Peter D.
Dickinson is entitled to a patent containing claim 53, which
claim corresponds to the count in interference.
ANDREW H. METZ )
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007