Interference No. 102,572
notebooks. Our review of CX-11 shows it to be a notebook No. 1446 issued to Holmes
consisting of unwitnessed pages with mostly illegible handwritten entries, abbreviations
and acronyms, along with a number of attachments. Our review of CX-12 and CX-13
shows them to consist of spiral bound notebooks containing a series of pages of mostly
illegible handwritten entries containing deletions, abbreviations and acronyms, and with a
number of attachments. The pages are unsigned and unwitnessed. The dates that do
appear on various pages of CX-12 are not in chronological order. CX-11, 12 and 13 are
non-probative.
CX-6 is identified by Wetzel as one of three notebooks (CX-6, CX-8 and CX-9) that
he reviewed in reconstructing the work he and Perry did on this project. Our review of the
CX-6 shows it to be a notebook issued to Wetzel, and consists of handwritten entries,
mostly illegible, unsigned, unwitnessed and undated except for Bate page Nos. 64 and 87.
CX-2 is identified by Riggs as a proposal he wrote. CX-2 and CX-6 have been identified
as to author. However, questions as to content and date as well as corroboration remain.
Both Perry and Rey indicate that it was their practice to date their notebooks and
then parenthetically refer to CX-8 and CX-15, respectively. Perry does not identify CX-9
as her notebook. Mumford testifies that he or someone under his supervision recorded
receipt of cultures and fermentations of the same into CX-17 and CX-18. Even assuming
arguendo that CX’s-8, 9, 15, 17 and 18 have been adequately identified as the
corroborator’s notebooks, the issue of whether these exhibits have been adequately
29
Page: Previous 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007