THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
MICHAEL DROR
and PAUL TRESCONY
Junior Party1
V.
STANTON J. ROWE
Senior Party2
____________
Interference No. 103,157
____________
JUDGMENT
____________
Before METZ, MARTIN, and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
On October 29, 1997 the Administrative Patent Judge
ordered the junior party to show cause why judgment should not be
1Patent No. 5,102,402, granted April 7, 1992, based
on 07/637,436, filed January 4, 1991. Assignor to Medtronic,
Inc., a Corp. of MN.
2Application 07/865,781, filed April 7, 1992.
Accorded benefit of Application 07/322,929, filed March 14,
1989. Assignor to Cordis Corporation, A corp. of FL.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007