UEMURA et al. V. PRYOR - Page 2




          Interference No. 103,408                                                   


                           Patent Interference No. 103,408                           
                                    ______________                                   
                                      JUDGMENT                                       
                                    _____________                                    

          METZ, PATE, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                      
          MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge                                        
                    Uemura et al. have filed a written concession of                 
          priority as to the subject matter of counts 1 and 2.                       
          Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered against Uemura et                  
          al.'s   claims that correspond to those count, i.e., patent                
          claims 1-4, which means Uemura et al. are not entitled to a                
          patent including those claims.  Judgment is awarded in favor               
          of Pryor's claims that correspond to the counts, i.e.,                     
          application claims 26-33, which means he is entitled to a                  
          patent including those claims.                                             


                                                  )                                  
                         __________________________ )                                
                              ANDREW H. METZ             )                           
                              Administrative Patent Judge)                           
                                                  )                                  
                                                       )         BOARD               
          OF                                                                         
                         __________________________ ) PATENT                         
          APPEALS                                                                    
                              WILLIAM F. PATE, III       )      AND                  
                              Administrative Patent Judge) INTERFERENCES             
                                          - 2 -                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007