Interference No. 103,681 HENDRIK M. GEYSEN Senior Party3 __________ Patent Interference No. 103,681 ___________ Before URYNOWICZ, SOFOCLEOUS and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT On April 7, 1998, junior party, Rutter et al., filed pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a) a concession of priority to Geysen (Paper No. 31). Accordingly, JUDGMENT as to the subject matter of the count in issue is hereby awarded to HENDRIK M. GEYSEN, the senior party. Accordingly, WILLIAM J. RUTTER and DANIEL V. SANTI, the junior party, are not entitled to their U.S. patent No. 5,225,533 containing claims 1-37 corresponding to the count and to their U.S. patent No. 5,010,175 containing claims 1-42 corresponding to the count. On this record, party Geysen is entitled to a patent containing claims 12 and 14. 3The application 07/968,366, filed 10/29/92. Accorded the Benefit of Applications 07/541, 169, filed 06/21/90, now patent No. 5,194,392, granted 03/16/93 Application 06/864,341, filed 05/22/86, all Abandoned; and Australian patent application PG 6188/84, filed 07/24/84. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007