THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
JAMES M. GRIFFITH
Junior Party1
V.
LLOYD WILLARD,
and WAYNE SIEBEN
Senior Party2
____________
Interference No. 103,838
____________
JUDGMENT
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, SOFOCLEOUS and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
1Patent No. 5,327,885, granted July 12, 1994, based
on Application 08/018,058, filed February 16, 1993. Accorded
benefit of Application 07/773,037, filed October 18, 1991, now
Patent No. 5,201,315, granted April 19, 1993.
2Application 08/498,946, filed July 5, 1995.
Accorded benefit of Application 07/946,000, filed September
15, 1992, now abandoned; 7/704,828, filed May 23, 1991,now
abandoned; 08/075,681, filed June 11, 1993; and 07/809,715,
filed December 18, 1991, now Patent No. 5,219,335, issued June
15, 1993. Assignor to Boston Scientific Corporation, a
Delaware Corp.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007