THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
KIYOSHI NASHIMOTO
Junior Party,1
v.
AKIRA OXAMIDE, SHIGERU KOBAYASHI,
HIDEAKI SHIMAMURA, SUSUMU TSUZUKU, EISUKE NISHITANI,
SATOSI KISIMOTO and YUJI YONEOKA
Senior Party.2
Interference No. 103,863
Before URYNOWICZ, SOFOCLEOUS and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent
Judge.
1Application No. 07/680,938, filed April 5, 1991, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,147,498, issued September 15, 1992. Assignor th
ANELVA Corp., Tokyo, Japan.
2Application No. 08/260,321, filed June 15, 1994.
Accorded Benefit of U.S. Application No. 07/741,526, filed
August 12, 1991; Japanese Application Nos. 01-318,749, filed
December 11, 1989, and 02-225,388, filed Augusg 29, 1990; and
PCT Application No. JP90/01601, filed December 10, 1990.
Assignor to Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007