THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
CATHERINE A. HESSION, ROY R. LOBB, SUSAN E. GOELZ,
LAURELEE OSBORN, CHRISTOPHER D. BENJAMIN and MARGARET D. ROSA
Junior Party1
v.
G. EDGAR RICE and MICHAEL P. BEVILACQUA
2
Senior Party
__________
Patent Interference No. 103,904
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, SOFOCLEOUS and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application 08/035,674, filed March 23, 1993, now Patent No. 5,357,056, issued
November 22, 1994. Accorded benefit of Application 07/452,675, filed December 18,
1989, now Patent No. 5,272,263, issued December 21, 1993. Assignee to Biogen, Inc..
2Application 08/099,102, filed July 29, 1993. Accorded benefit of Application
07/310,201, filed February 14, 1989.
1
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007