GIL et al. V. ABRAMOVITZ et al. - Page 4




          Interference No. 103,966                                                   


               As to count 4, Abramovitz et al. are not entitled to                  
          their involved claim 17.  On this record, Gil et al. are                   
          entitled to their involved claim 32.                                       
               Judgment as to the subject matter of count 3 is hereby                
          awarded to Abramovitz et al.  Therefore, Gil et al. are not                
          entitled to their involved claim 31.  On this record,                      
          Abramovitz et al. are entitled to their involved claim 16.                 








                    _____________________________ )                                  
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )                                   
                                                  )                                  
                                                  )                                  
                                                  )   BOARD OF PATENT                
                    _____________________________ )     APPEALS AND                  
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )    INTERFERENCES                  
                                                  )                                  
                                                  )                                  
                                                  )                                  
                    _____________________________ )                                  
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )                                   
                                                                                    





                                          4                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007