Interference No. 104,045 Before CALVERT, PATE and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges. CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT Since Otruba has not filed a response to the order to show cause issued on September 24, 1998 (Paper No. 19), and the time set for filing a response has expired, this case is taken up for the entry of judgment. In Paper No. 19, the Otruba motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(4) to designate claims 12 to 15 of his involved patent as not corresponding to the count was granted as to claims 12 to 14. Accordingly, the interference is redeclared herewith to reflect that decision. In view of the Joint Concession of Unpatentability of the Count (Paper No. 16), and the redeclaration herewith, it is hereby adjudged, pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a), that the junior party, Svatoboj Otruba, is not entitled to claims 1, 4 to 11 and 15 of his involved patent, designated as correspond- 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007