EDDISON et al. V. SMITH et al. - Page 2




          Interference No. 104,055                                                    


               Now comes the junior party Eddison et al. with a                       
          disclaimer of patent claims 1-4, 6-13, and 15-23. These are                 
          all the claims designated as corresponding to the count. Under              
          37 CFR                                                                      
          § 1.662(c), a disclaimer of all patent claims designated as                 
          corresponding to the count is to be treated as a request for                
          entry of adverse judgment. Accordingly, the following judgment              
          is entered.                                                                 

                                      Judgment                                        
               Judgment is hereby entered against Alan Eddison, Charles               
          Ingold, and Lawrence J. Leising, the junior party. Alan                     
          Eddison, Charles Ingold, and Lawrence J. Leising are not                    
          entitled to their patent containing claims 1-4, 6-13, and 15-               
          23, which claims correspond to the count in interference.                   
          Judgment is entered in favor of Michael L. Smith and Charles                
          E. Goodman, the senior party. Michael L. Smith and Charles E.               
          Goodman are entitled to a patent containing claims 1, 2, 5, 6,              
          9, 10, 17, and 19-48, which claims correspond to the count in               
          interference.                                                               




                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007