Interference No. 104,175
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT
During a telephone conference on December 3, 1998, Mr.
Coleman, lead counsel for junior party Lin et al. (Lin)
represented that Lin has not filed any testimony-in-chief in
this interference, and does not intend to do so. Moreover,
Mr. Coleman represented that Lin would not file any paper to
show good cause why judgment should not be entered under 37
CFR § 1.652. Under these circumstances, entry of
judgment against Lin is in order and, accordingly, judgment is
hereby entered as follows:
Judgment as to the subject matter of the counts in issue
is hereby awarded to senior party Mansour et al. (Mansour).
Junior party Lin is not entitled to its involved patent
containing claims 1-2, corresponding to count 1, and claim 3,
corresponding to count 2.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007