Ex parte HARRISON et al. - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        
                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                                                     
                 publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                            
                                                                                                           Paper No. 27                                 

                                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                         
                                                                   __________                                                                           
                                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                          
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                   __________                                                                           
                                                    Ex parte RICHARD W. HARRISON                                                                        
                                                          and JOHN F. SCARZELLO                                                                         
                                                                   __________                                                                           
                                                              Appeal No. 95-4662                                                                        
                                                            Application 08/048,1011                                                                     
                                                                  ___________                                                                           
                                                                     ON BRIEF                                                                           
                                                                  ___________                                                                           
                 Before THOMAS, FLEMING and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                   
                 CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                               

                                                     ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                                                           
                          This is a decision on a request for rehearing filed July 23, 1998 (Paper No. 26),                                             
                 of our Decision dated July 14, 1998 (Paper No. 25).  Appellants argue that: (1) our                                                    
                 decision is confusingly characterized as an amplification of the examiner’s reasons                                                    
                 whereas in fact the opinion is inconsistent with the examiner’s reasoning and presents                                                 

                          1Application for patent filed April 16, 1993.                                                                                 
                                                                           1                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007