THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WILLIAM R. HAMBURGEN
________________
Appeal No. 96-0979
Application No. 07/979,5521
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Appellant requests reconsideration of our decision of
April 30, 1997, wherein we affirmed the examiner's rejection of
the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
1Application for patent filed November 18, 1992.
According to appellant, this application is a division of
Application 07/725,376, filed June 27, 1991, now abandoned; which
is a continuation of Application No. 07/542,180, June 22, 1990,
now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007