Appeal No. 97-0292
Application 07/814,779
The appellants also note that “there is no clear teaching
in the examples of Cline utilizing 15% sole total filler or
anything remotely close” (request, page 3) and contend that
the “examples in Cline, however, have been wholly overlooked
by the Board” (request, page 4). While it is true that there
is no specific example in Cline of utilizing 15% sole total
filler, a reference
must be evaluated for all it teaches and is not limited to its
specific examples. In re Snow, 471 F.2d 1400, 1403, 176 USPQ
328, 329 (CCPA 1973).
The appellants’ request is granted to the extent of
reconsidering our decision, but is denied with respect to
making any changes therein.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
DENIED
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007