COCHRAN et al. V. SONDERMEIJER et al. - Page 15

                                                Judgment                                                 
            In view of the foregoing, judgment is hereby entered as follows:                             
            Cochran et al. the junior party, is not entitled to a patent containing its claims           
      1, 4 and 12 corresponding to the count.                                                            
            On the record before us, Sondermeijer et al., the senior party, is entitled to its           
      patent containing claims 1-19 corresponding to the count.                                          


                        MARC L. CAROFF                     )                                             
                        Administrative latent Judge        )                                             
                                                           )                                             
                        MARY F'. DOWNEY                    )    BOARD OF PATENT                          
                        Administrative Patent Judge        )    APPEALS AND                              
                                                               INTERFERENCES                             
                        HUBERT C. LORIN                      )                                           
                        Administrative Patent Judge          )                                           
      jrg                                                                                                































Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007