Interference No. 103,036
Patent No. 4,723,656. [See pages 8 to 18 of the opening brief
and Addendum A to the opening brief.]
C. The parties Wang's claims 43, 45 to 48, 50, 51, 53 to 59, 62
and 63, Cataldi's patent claims 9, 11 to 14, 16, 17, 19 to 23, 28
and 29, Cataldi's reissue claims 9, 11 to 14, 16, 17, 19 to 23
and 28 to 40, Burroughs' reissue claims 16, 18, 20, 22 to 24,11
26, 28, 29, 33, 35 to 37, 39, 41, 42, 44, 46, and 48 to 50 are
anticipated by Parker, U.S. Patent No. 4,747,020, or by the prior
art BatCheck tester.® [Pages 19 to 28 of the opening brief]
D. The party Wang's claims 22 to 24 are anticipated by Sterling,
U.S. Patent No. 1,497,388. [Pages 29 to 34 of the opening brief]
E. All of the parties' claims corresponding to the count are
obvious over Sterling, U.S. Patent No. 1,497,388 in view of
Kiernan, U.S. Patent No. 4,723,656, Parker, U.S. Patent No.
The party Tucholski does not assert that the party Burroughs11
et al.'s patent claims 1 to 11 or its reissue claims 13 to 15, 17,
19, 21, 25, 27, 30 to 32, 34, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, and 51 are
anticipated by Parker, U.S. Patent No. 4,747,020, or by the prior art
BatCheck tester.
-12-
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007