Interference No. 103,056
that Dean patent and reissue claims 8, 22 and 23 remain designated as corresponding
to count 2. This interference will be redeclared in a concurrent paper to reflect the
correct claim correspondence of the Dean et al. patent and reissue application claims.
Accordingly, the judgment issued August 20, 1998 is hereby vacated and the following
judgment is issued.
Judgment
In view of decision of August 20, 1998, now modified as set forth in this decision
on reconsideration, judgment as to the subject matter of count 2 is awarded to Parker et
al. and against Dean et al. On this record, DAVID PARKER and THOMAS A.
MILLICAN are entitled to a patent containing claims 25-29 corresponding to count 2,
and RICHARD DEAN and ROBERT W. WEBER (the patentees) are not entitled to their
patent containing claims 1-23 corresponding to count 2 and RICHARD DEAN and
ROBERT W. WEBER (the reissue applicants) are not entitled to a patent containing
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007