THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES C. JOSEPH, MICHAEL A. PIKULIN, and
WILLIAM H. FRIEND
____________
Appeal No. 94-4357
Application No. 07/739,0501
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, PAK and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Joseph et al. (appellants) appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 1, 2, 4 through 11, 13 through 20,
33 through 44 and 46 through 54, which are all of the claims
remaining in the application. Claim 8 was amended subsequent
to the final rejection.
1Application for patent filed August 1, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007