Ex parte JOSEPH et al. - Page 16




          Appeal No. 94-4357                                                          
          Application No. 07/739,050                                                  


          step in the manner recited in claim 13 and its dependent                    
          claims.  We adopt appellants’ reasoning at pages 13 and 14 of               
          the Brief as our own.                                                       
               As a final point, we advise both the examiner and                      
          appellants to review the contents of Norwegian Patent                       
          Application Nos. 77 1473 and 77 1474 referred to in the                     
          Fritzvold reference before the issuance of a patent on this                 
          application.  It appears that the above-mentioned Norwegian                 
          Patent Applications are the closest prior art.  See Fritzvold,              
          columns 7 and 8.  They may affect the patentability of the                  
          subject matter recited in some or all of the appealed claims.               


















                                         16                                           





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007