THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RICHARD A. HAYES
________________
Appeal No. 95-0311
Application No. 07/976,8461
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, SOFOCLEOUS and GRON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
SOFOCLEOUS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to
11, all the claims remaining in the application.
The subject matter on appeal relates to a composition
consisting essentially of a polyacetal and an amine light
1Application for patent filed November 16, 1992.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation-in-
part of Application No. 07/722,456, filed June 27, 1991, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007