THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT A. LINDNER
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0319
Application 07/916,1801
______________
HEARD: April 7, 1997
_______________
Before METZ, JOHN D. SMITH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellant requests rehearing of our decision entered December 7, 1998 wherein we affirmed
the examiner’s rejection of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 principally based
1Application for patent filed July 17, 1992. According to applicant, this Application is a
division of Application 07/554,790, filed July 18, 1990, now Patent No. 5,134,185, issued July 28,
1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007