THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROKI SAWADA, HIROSHI NAGUMO,
TOYOMI KOIKE, AKIO KIMURA, and AKIRA YAMAMURO
____________
Appeal No. 95-0565
Application 07/867,0891
____________
HEARING: March 7, 19972
____________
Before WINTERS, GRON, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GRON, Administrative Patent Judge.
Application for patent filed April 14, 1992. According1
to applicants, this application is a continuation of U.S.
Application 07/494,367, filed March 16, 1990, abandoned.
Administrative Patent Judges Winters, Gron, and Weimar2
heard appellants’ oral argument on March 7, 1997. Judge
Weimar has since left the Board. Her seat on the panel
reviewing this appeal has been taken by Judge Spiegel.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007