THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 46
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WILLIAM M. MENGER,
ERNEST E. KERN, O.C. KARKALITS,
DONALD L. WISE, ALFRED P. LEUSCHNER,
DAVID ODELSON, and HANS E. GRETHLEIN
__________
Appeal No. 95-0802
1
Application 07/814,078
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before DOWNEY, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
1 Application for patent filed December 24, 1991. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/686,271, filed April 15, 1991; which is a
continuation of Application 07/156,532, filed February 16, 1988; which is a continuation-in-
part of Application 06/693,028, filed January 22, 1985, now Patent No. 4,826,769, and a
continuation-in-part of Application 06/816,289, filed January 6, 1986, now Patent No.
4,845,034.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007