THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MARK L. COLLINS and DAVID V. MORRISSEY
_____________
Appeal No. 95-1178
Application 07/902,5171
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge and
WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have chosen to appeal the examiner's decision refusing to allow claims
14 through 18, 22 through 24, 33 through 35, 38 through 40, 48 through 51 and 60. See
the Appeal Brief, page 2.
Application for patent filed June 22, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a1
continuation of application serial no. 07/321,728, filed March 10, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007