Ex parte TANAKA - Page 2




                             REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION                              

               Appellant requests that we reconsider and modify our                   
          decision dated March 17, 1998 to indicate that the rejection                
          of claim 11 is reversed.                                                    
               Appellant now presents new arguments that the references               
          of record, whether considered alone or in combination, fail to              
          either teach or suggest the invention as claimed by Appellant.              
          However, these new arguments were not presented in the                      
          Appellant's brief nor has Appellant addressed why these                     
          arguments were not presented earlier in the brief.                          


               37 CFR § 1.192 (a) as amended at 58 Fed. Reg. 53196,                   
          October 10, 1997, which was controlling at the time of                      
          Appellant's filing of the reconsideration, states as follows:               
               Any arguments or authorities not included in the                       
               brief will be refused consideration by the Board of                    
               Patent Appeals and Interferences, unless good cause                    
               is shown.                                                              


               Appellant has not shown good cause as to why these                     
          arguments were not presented earlier in the brief.  Therefore,              
          we will refuse to consider these arguments in the request for               
          reconsideration.                                                            



                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007