THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 56
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN E. BROWN
____________
Appeal No. 95-1971
Application No. 08/126,1301
____________
HEARD: March 10, 1999
____________
Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed September 24, 1993.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/853,846 filed March 19, 1992, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/614,486 filed November 16, 1990, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007