THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DALE B. SCHENK,
ROBIN M. BARBOUR and KELLY L. JOHNSON
__________
Appeal No. 1995-1989
Application 07/850,1421
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before ELLIS, ROBINSON and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims
80 through 108, all the claims remaining in the application. Claims 80, 93 and 105
are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and read as follows:
1Application for patent filed March 12, 1992. According to the appellants, this
application is a continuation of Application 07/235,055, filed August 19, 1988, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007