Appeal No. 95-1999 Application No. 08/047,381 in which, at least one of R or R represents H; and2 3 with the proviso that said composition is suitable for preparing a temporary dental restorative material having a hard and inflexible consistency. THE REFERENCES OF RECORD The Examiner relied upon the following references of record. Foley, Jr. (Foley) 4,243,790 Jan. 6, 1981 Strüver et al. (Strüver) 4,319,015 Mar. 9, 1982 THE REJECTIONS Claims 39 through 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Foley or Strüver.2 2In the Final Rejection dated 02/08/94, the examiner rejected claims 23 through 38. Two proposed amendments, both dated April 28, 1994, were submitted. The first proposed amendment canceled claims 23 through 38 and added claims 39 through 44. The proposed supplemental amendment added claims 45 through 47. In an advisory action dated 05/12/94, the (continued...) 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007