Ex parte CHERUVU et al. - Page 14




               Appeal No.      95-2035                                                                                                
               Serial No.      08/083,864                                                                                             
               provisional rejection of claims 1-6 and 12-14 under the judicially created                                             

               doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13 and                  

               14 of copending application 08/083,866 is sustained.                                                                   

                       Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is AFFIRMED.                                                         

                       No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be                          

               extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).                                                                                      

                                                            AFFIRMED                                                                  






                                       JOHN D. SMITH                                  )                                               
                                       Administrative Patent Judge                    )                                               
                                                                                      )                                               
                                                                                      )                                               
                                                                                      )                                               
                                                                                      ) BOARD OF PATENT                               
                                       THOMAS A. WALTZ                                )     APPEALS                                   
                                       Administrative Patent Judge                    )       AND                                     
                                                                                      )  INTERFERENCES                                
                                                                                      )                                               
                                                                                      )                                               
                                                                                      )                                               
                                       CAROL A. SPIEGEL                               )                                               
                                       Administrative Patent Judge                    )                                               






                                                              Page 14                                                                 





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007