Appeal No. 95-2035 Serial No. 08/083,864 provisional rejection of claims 1-6 and 12-14 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13 and 14 of copending application 08/083,866 is sustained. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is AFFIRMED. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED JOHN D. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT THOMAS A. WALTZ ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) CAROL A. SPIEGEL ) Administrative Patent Judge ) Page 14Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007