THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in
a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YUSUF G. ADEWUYI and J. SCOTT BUCHANAN
____________
Appeal No. 95-2227
Application No. 08/048,9641
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ROBINSON, and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-20,
which are all of the claims pending in the case. Independent claim 1 is illustrative of the
subject matter on appeal is reproduced below:
1. A catalytic cracking process for converting a heavy hydrocarbon feed to lighter
products comprising;
1 Application for patent, filed April 16, 1993. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/877,935, filed May 4, 1992, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007