THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JAMES J. FINLEY, MEHRAN ARBAB and THOMAS J. WAYNAR
________________
Appeal No. 95-2799
Application No. 07/799,8061
________________
HEARD: February 10, 1999
________________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, KIMLIN and GARRIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-
10. Claim 11-20, the other claims remaining in the present
application, stand withdrawn from consideration pursuant to a
restriction requirement. Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A temperable, metallic coated article comprising:
1Application for patent filed November 29, 1991
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007