THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte THOMAS J. CUMMINS, SUSAN M. ATWOOD,
LYNN BERGMEYER, JOHN B. FINDLAY,
JOHN W. H. SUTHERLAND, and JOANNE H. KERSCHNER
__________
Appeal No. 1995-2839
Application 08/062,0231
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before DOWNEY, WILLIAM F. SMITH and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims
15 through 27 and 33. Claims 1 through 14, 31 and 32 have been withdrawn from
consideration pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b). Claims 28 through 30 have been
1Application for patent filed May 14, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007