THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MICHAEL E. THOMAS ____________ Appeal No. 95-2896 Application No. 07/977,7711 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 11, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We reverse. 1Application for patent filed November 17, 1992.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007